<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>A Comfortable Atrocity: Bearing Witness Beyond the Courtroom</dc:title><dc:creator>Conway, Samuel </dc:creator><dc:subject>Holocaust testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>bearing witness</dc:subject><dc:subject>non-juridical testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>memory and representation</dc:subject><dc:subject>the gray zone</dc:subject><dc:subject>banality of evil</dc:subject><dc:subject>thoughtlessness</dc:subject><dc:subject>trauma and witnessing</dc:subject><dc:subject>Manichaean narrative</dc:subject><dc:subject>aestheticization</dc:subject><dc:subject>juridical testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>show trial</dc:subject><dc:subject>Holocaust museology</dc:subject><dc:subject>sites of memory</dc:subject><dc:subject>popular culture</dc:subject><dc:subject>Primo Levi</dc:subject><dc:subject>Hannah Arendt</dc:subject><dc:subject>Shoshana Felman</dc:subject><dc:subject>Claude Lanzmann</dc:subject><dc:subject>Shoah</dc:subject><dc:subject>Zone of Interest</dc:subject><dc:subject>Eichmann trial</dc:subject><dc:subject>Demjanjuk trial</dc:subject><dc:subject>self-justification</dc:subject><dc:subject>perpetrator narrative</dc:subject><dc:subject>institutional resolution</dc:subject><dc:subject>incompleteness of testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>silence as testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>Sonderkommando</dc:subject><dc:subject>contamination and guilt</dc:subject><dc:subject>Holocaust testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>Bearing witness</dc:subject><dc:subject>Non-juridical testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>Testimony</dc:subject><dc:subject>Memory</dc:subject><dc:subject>Representation</dc:subject><dc:subject>Gray Zone</dc:subject><dc:subject>Banality</dc:subject><dc:subject>Trauma</dc:subject><dc:subject>Manichaean</dc:subject><dc:subject>Shoah</dc:subject><dc:subject>Zone of Interest</dc:subject><dc:subject>Shoshana Felman</dc:subject><dc:subject>Claude Lanzmann</dc:subject><dc:subject>Eichmann trial</dc:subject><dc:subject>Sonderkommando</dc:subject><dc:subject>Contamination</dc:subject><dc:coverage>English</dc:coverage><dc:relation>B A</dc:relation><dc:description>Holocaust testimony is a gesture that points to the limits of language and representation. A mode of remembrance and partial understanding, it bridges the gap between law and art, fact and emotion, past and present. Drawing on the works of Shoshana Felman, Claude Lanzmann, Primo Levi, Hannah Arendt, Yossi Bloch, Daniel Sivan, Jonathan Glazer, and others, we can explore the paradoxes and complexities of human nature, the fragility of memory, and the incompleteness of testimony. Perpetrators portray themselves as victims, developing a narrative of self-justification. The courtroom, the judge, the jury, the prosecutor, and the defense regulate honesty. And the banality of evil manifests itself in the everyday language and behavior of both those who witnessed and those who carried out the genocide. Museums, films, and sites of memory share the courtrooms’ demand for resolution, routing visitors and viewers from atrocity toward meaning along a predictable and comfortable path. But they cannot do what the most powerful testimony does: linger on the unresolved and resist the clarity that institutions demand. Perhaps every framework built to remember the Holocaust has, in its own way, flattened what it claimed to preserve.</dc:description><dc:contributor>Lisa Ruth Sternlieb, Thesis Supervisor</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Matt Tierney, Thesis Honors Advisor</dc:contributor><dc:rights>open_access</dc:rights><dc:date>2026-04-06T23:59:40Z</dc:date><dc:identifier>https://honors.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/10202spc6160</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc>