<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Incidents in the South China Sea: Exploring the Chinese Perspective of the Disputes</dc:title><dc:creator>Black, Benjamin Daniel</dc:creator><dc:subject>South China Sea</dc:subject><dc:subject>Political Science</dc:subject><dc:subject>International Affairs</dc:subject><dc:subject>Asian Studies</dc:subject><dc:subject>International Politics</dc:subject><dc:subject>China</dc:subject><dc:subject>Maritime Dispute</dc:subject><dc:subject>Hegemony</dc:subject><dc:coverage>Asian Studies</dc:coverage><dc:relation>B A</dc:relation><dc:description>Incidents in the South China Sea have increased in frequency over the past decade, leading
to an increased need for an informed policy response. Despite the prevalence of the South China
Sea disputes in policymaking and scholarly discourse, empirical work to understand the driving
forces behind China's actions in the region has not been undertaken with a Chinese perspective,
leaving policymakers without crucial information and an incomplete understanding of Chinese
actions in the region. International Maritime Law is understood to be the framework for peace in
the region, but this paper suggests that the Law of the Sea has ceased to be effective because China
has ceased to abide by it. Furthermore, alternative avenues to peace and stability must include the
Chinese perspective and a better understanding of the reasons for increased Chinese action and
incidents in the region.
This paper seeks to analyze the driving forces behind China’s actions in two models. First,
through an original coding of two Chinese-language newspapers from 1970-2015 to test for the
presence of nationalistic terms. A second model employs a wide range of hegemony indicators to
test for China’s level of regional hegemony and its relationship to incidents from 1970-2015. My
findings point to an over-use of nationalism to describe Chinese actions and a clear conclusion that
China’s regional hegemony is driving its increased action in the South China Sea.</dc:description><dc:contributor>Dr. Gretchen G Casper, Thesis Supervisor</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Jessamyn Reich Abel, Thesis Honors Advisor</dc:contributor><dc:rights>open_access</dc:rights><dc:date>2018-04-05T00:51:30Z</dc:date><dc:identifier>https://honors.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/5124bdb5244</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc>